Skip to main content

Custodial Storage of Cryptoassets

As discussed in the introductory section, ownership of cryptoassets is determined by control over the private key. In practice, however, many users do not manage their keys themselves but instead delegate their storage to a specialized entity — a custodian.

Custodial storage is a model in which private keys are controlled by a third party, while the user accesses their assets through an account within the service. In essence, the user entrusts the safekeeping of their cryptoassets to the provider’s infrastructure.

Where the Custodial Model Is Used​

The custodial model is widely employed across the crypto industry. It is used by centralized cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance, Bybit, and OKX, as well as by specialized custodial firms, banks, and fintech platforms.

A user creates an account, completes identity verification if required, and the management of private keys is handled by the provider. From the user’s perspective, interaction with assets resembles the use of a traditional bank account: authentication is performed via login and password, two-factor authentication is commonly applied, and account recovery mechanisms are available.

Why Custodial Storage Became Widespread​

The widespread adoption of this model is primarily explained by its convenience.

Users are not required to independently generate and secure private keys, store seed phrases, or ensure proper backup procedures. Service interfaces are typically intuitive, mobile applications are available, and integration with trading platforms and fiat payment infrastructure is often provided.

For institutional participants, custodial providers may also offer auditing, reporting, and regulatory compliance services, making them an important component of modern financial infrastructure.

From the user’s perspective, the custodial model significantly reduces the technical complexity of working with cryptoassets.

The Economic Logic of the Model​

From an economic standpoint, custodial storage represents the delegation of control to an intermediary. In this respect, it reintroduces a familiar model of financial trust into the digital environment.

The custodian becomes the central point of asset storage and assumes operational and technical responsibilities. The user, in turn, relinquishes direct control over the private keys and accepts dependence on the provider’s stability and governance.

Accordingly, the model implies a centralized architecture and the presence of counterparty risk — similar to that found in the traditional banking system.

Advantages of Custodial Storage​

The custodial model offers several practical advantages:

  • ease of use,
  • no need for users to manage private keys independently,
  • the possibility of account recovery,
  • integration with trading and payment services,
  • regulatory compliance,
  • institutional-grade security standards.

These characteristics make custodial storage a rational choice for beginners, active traders, and organizations requiring operational infrastructure.

Risks of Custodial Storage​

The primary risk lies in the absence of direct control over private keys. Users depend on the financial condition, internal governance, and security standards of the provider.

The history of the crypto market demonstrates that such risks are not merely theoretical.

In 2014, the exchange Mt.Gox declared bankruptcy after losing more than 700,000 BTC as a result of a security breach. A significant portion of client funds was never recovered.

In 2022, one of the world’s largest exchanges — FTX — filed for bankruptcy. Client access to assets was frozen, and the subsequent distribution of funds proceeded through court-administered bankruptcy processes.

Such cases illustrate that under the custodial model, cryptoassets may be:

  • frozen or restricted,
  • drawn into bankruptcy proceedings,
  • partially or fully lost.

Additional risks include:

  • cyberattacks targeting centralized infrastructure,
  • regulatory-based asset freezes,
  • operational restrictions arising from legal disputes,
  • concentration of assets within centralized storage systems.

The Balance Between Convenience and Risk​

The custodial model remains a rational choice in certain contexts — for example, in active trading or when a user lacks the technical capacity to manage keys independently.

However, it is essential to recognize the fundamental distinction: under custodial storage, users hold their assets indirectly — through the infrastructure of a third party. Convenience becomes the model’s primary advantage, while dependence on the provider constitutes its core risk.

Conclusion​

Custodial storage represents a centralized model of cryptoasset management in which control over private keys is transferred to a specialized provider. It offers a high level of convenience and integration with financial infrastructure.

At the same time, this model entails counterparty risk, which in the history of the crypto industry has resulted in partial or complete loss of user funds.

Choosing custodial storage requires a clear understanding of the balance between convenience and direct control.